EXPOSE: VINCE THE FAKER

ONE fAKER:Vincent Chia
WHO PRETENDS TO KEEP HIS BLOG SANITIZED
BY DELETING ALL POSTs NOT IN IS FAVOR
AND NOT PUBLISHING ALL COMMENTS EXPOSING HIS FRAUD
HAS LEFT A TRAIL OF CRAP ALL OVER THE WEB.
OFTEN SEEN WITH HIS pUPPY B.Sc (hon.k)
HE WILL ENTER BLOGS WHEN NO ONE ASK HIM TO.
HIS INTENTION IS DIRECT: TO CONDEMN IN THE GUISE OF CORRECTION
HIS MOTIVE IS CLEAR: A SICK CRAVING FOR ATTENTION TO HIS KNOWLEDGE
THE END RESULTS IS THE USUAL: HE GET FUCKED

The sample below is as recent as 10 May 2008. The only reason this expose is pasted here is to warn all who are reading that there is a FAKER out there with a white coat and a bible in his pocket who claims to be a follower of Jesus Christ and writes extensively for many other genuine chrsitians BUT who actually have no heart and no mind of the CHRIST of the gospel.

"God loves, Man Kills"

Dhope May 10, 2008 @ 21:57 PST
Hi, interesting read. I do hope however that you could remove the rebuttals or even better, remove this post.
I think it is polite to respect other people’s religions and not aggressively denounce it’s value. What is coal to one man might be gold to another.
And it is also unfair to do line quote rebuttals as the context of the entire passage will be lost. Finally, I would like to advise, based on Jesus’ teachings, that “Let he who is without sin be the first to judge”.
God Bless.

Comment by Vincent Chia May 10, 2008 @ 23:10 PST
DHOPE,
Hi there!
I was actually quite amused when I read your comment here, coz your comment is literally self-contradictory and internally inconsistent.
You wrote:
“I think it is polite to respect other people’s religions and not aggressively denounce it’s value.”
Answer (from your own comment):
“What is coal to one man might be gold to another.”
So my “gold” is to “denounce” other religions; unfortunately, that’s your coal. So why don’t you keep your comment to yourself? I have my gold, and you keep your coal?
You wrote:“Finally, I would like to advise, based on Jesus’ teachings, that “Let he who is without sin be the first to judge”.”
Answer (also from your comment):
“It is also unfair to do line quote rebuttals as the context of the entire passage will be lost.”
So why are you quoting “one line” from “Jesus’ teachings” and using that as a rebuttal?
Duh!

Comment by Mike May 11, 2008 @ 22:06 PST
Keep your comment to yourself????
Vincent ~ I appreciate your responses. I would like to add my observation. If I was relying on your responses to DHOPE as a pathway to whether or not I wanted to explore Christianity, I would probably look another direction.
Just a little thought from the cheap seats.

Comment by Vincent Chia May 12, 2008 @ 0:14 PST
Mike,
Thanks for the comment. I was merely quoting from what DHOPE had written (and showing the logical inconsistencies). If you find that offensive, complain about those quotes to the original writer.
“Keep your comment to yourself????”
That’s what DHOPE is suggesting to Isaiah … to remove the post/critique. Why don’t you have a problem with that (double standards)? (DHOPE wrote, “I do hope however that you could remove the rebuttals or even better, remove this post.”)
I know; some would prefer internally inconsistent, self-contradictory opinions, as long as the comment suit their ears.
I avoid saying what others want to hear; I believe that’s not our “job.”
(PS: By the way, I’m a Calvinist; in other words, God seeks man, not vice versa.)

Comment by Daniel Chew May 12, 2008 @ 3:15 PST
[The other Mike]:
> If I was relying on your responses to DHOPE as a pathway to whether or not I wanted to explore Christianity, I would probably look another direction.
In other words, if a person attacks Christianity, it is fine. But if Christians defend their religion, then you are offended. Says a lot actually…

Comment by Mike May 12, 2008 @ 7:59 PST
Actually it doesn’t say anything at all because you both made the assumption that I was offended.

Comment by Vincent Chia May 12, 2008 @ 16:51 PST
Mike,
Ok, let’s assume you weren’t offended, or find the comment negative.
Then what do you mean by this:
“If I was relying on your responses to DHOPE as a pathway to whether or not I wanted to explore Christianity, I would probably look another direction.”?
What is your problem?

Comment by Mike May 12, 2008 @ 21:42 PST
“So my “gold” is to “denounce” other religions; unfortunately, that’s your coal. So why don’t you keep your comment to yourself? I have my gold, and you keep your coal?”
The bolded part, to me, might have well been “SHUT UP, your opinion doesn’t matter”. It was a complete communication shut down….
which really isn’t a problem for me. Like I said, I was throwing in a little peanut gallery opinion poll.

Comment by Vincent Chia May 12, 2008 @ 23:15 PST
hey Mike,
Did you really read DHOPE’s comment?
He said, “I do hope however that you could remove the rebuttals or even better, remove this post.”
Isn’t that a better, “SHUT UP, and get rid of your opinion RIGHT NOW!”
So again, what is your problem? You didn’t have a problem with DHOPE’s comment, especially his “get RID of your POST NOW!” part. SO who is shutting up WHO?
And please re-read my analysis of what DHOPE had written.
It was DHOPE who insisted that “What is coal to one man might be gold to another.”
So, by logical extrapolation of DHOPE’s statement, I wrote:
“So my “gold” is to “denounce” other religions; unfortunately, that’s your coal. So why don’t you keep your comment to yourself? I have my gold, and you keep your coal?” geddit?
Have you heard of a reductio ad absurdum?

Comment by Also Known As Mike May 13, 2008 @ 21:01 PST
So let me rephrase what you’re telling me. Since he made his comment, that leaves you free to make the same comment back, only stronger. Hmm. So I guess if what you say is true, then pigs can fly!!

Comment by Daniel Chew May 14, 2008 @ 4:06 PST
Also known as Mike:
Please do everyone a favor and read up what the phrase “Reductio Ad Absurdum” mean before you post a commment displaying your ignorance.

Comment by Vincent Chia May 14, 2008 @ 5:28 PST
Daniel,
(A yawning emoticon)

JC May 16, 2008 @ 5:10 PST
I love good debate when it comes to doctrine. Unfortunately, there will always be some simple-minded folks who rather spew hatred, to fellow Christians no-less. Radical Islam is smiling…

DO NOT BE DECEIVED BY THIS PERSON HIGH SOUNDING LATIN IN HIS BLOG. THIS MAN HAS AT ONE TIME OR ANOTHER TRIED TO INTIMIDATE AND MANIPULATE ONE OF THE CONTRIBUTORS AT JEREMIAH. WE WERE FORTUNATE TO READ HIS CON EARLY AND EXPOSED HIM MERCILESSLY FOR BEING A FRAUD. DO NOT BE DECEIVED BY THIS FAKER IN WHITE COAT.

Hey Vincent if you are peeping, here's a world wide web greeting for you: FUCK OFF!
NO ONE ASK YOU TO COME.

Mike is watching you.
Yeah, MIKE is watching you too.