Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Dutroux and Abrasax

In 2004, Marc Dutroux was convicted of torture, sexual abuse and torture of 6 young girls between the age of 9 to 16, of whom 4 he also murdered in Belgium from 1995-96. His supposed accomplice, Michel Nihoul was acquitted of murder or of any involvement on his part. His other accomplice, Bernard Weinstein was murdered by Dutroux after having his testicles crushed. But, what is shocking was Dutroux reveals in Court that he was in fact a pawn of a child sex-ring that was protected by the police and politicians. Excerpts of this news from CNN can be found here.http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/03/03/belgium.trial/index.html

Is this just a rambling of a paedophile who wants to get himself off the hook?

This is the full article on Dutroux's possible link to the gruesome murder/torture of Christine Hess in 1984. A large part of this article contains the statement of one of the witness XI of this murder..


The interesting thing is the statement by the witness linking the paedophile ring to prominent directors of banks and politicians. Below is the quote from the full article from De Morgan, January 1997.

"Who is XI? A small, 27-year-old woman, surprisingly self-confident, with an incredible history. As a baby she was entrusted to her grandmother, who lived in Knokke. There she was raised as a child prostitute. Until the age of ten, she was handed over like goods for sale in hotel rooms in Knokke. XI explained that as an adolescent, while watching TV she would occasionally see those who had raped her. Ministers, burgomasters, barons, or the managing directors of banks and important companies. That these men raped her was OK, said XI, that was bearable. The murders, that was the real problem. The pleasure of these clients was accentuated by the anguish of the child. Their greatest pleasure matched the greatest anguish, that of death. According to XI, for the organisation and the protection of their debauchery, these well-known figures turned to small-time criminals like her own procurer Tony, or characters like Marc Dutroux, Michel Nihoul and Bernard Weinstein."

The witness went on to correctly identify the murder/torture items like the electric wire with its covers melted, and also an enermous nail, which at that time was unknown to even the investigators. She also correctly drawn out the plan of the schene of murder, and also the secret hideouts of prominent people. This lends credibility to the information of Witness XI. With such a witness why was the case of the murder of Christine Hess never solved? That is the question that still puzzles me. Going back to the case in 1995-96, we see the below entry from Wikepedia:

As mentioned the case causes widespread discontent at Belgium with the justice system. The officers investigating Dutroux's house did not act on the kidnapped girl's cries at all.

More shocking is the threat by the "shadowy figures" to the original judge who ordered investigations into the activities of Dutroux and the paedophile rings connection. Of course the judge was removed before the trial came to an end. Read the excerpts from his testimony on the witness stand:

"On the witness stand, Jean-Marc Connerotte, the original judge of the case, broke down in tears when he described "the bullet-proof vehicles and armed guards needed to protect him against the shadowy figures determined to stop the full truth coming out. Never before in Belgium has an investigating judge at the service of the king been subjected to such pressure. We were told by police that [murder] contracts had been taken out against the magistrates." Connerotte testified that the investigation was seriously hampered by protection of suspects by people in the government. "Rarely has so much energy been spent opposing an inquiry," he said. He believed that the Mafia had taken control of the case.[1]"

Also interesting was the link to Abrasax, the god of which the girls are sacrificed for. The details were found in the letter from Weinstein's body. The definition of Abrasax from Occultopedia


From David Icke, we know that Michel Nihoul was the leader of the paedophile rings, conducting black masses with high ranking officers, policemen and judges in attendance. "The Biggest Secret" was written in 1999, and it is interesting to note that Nihoul himselfs was acquitted at the end of the trial in 2004. Could Dutroux be only a scapegoat?

The shocking truth for most of us is that:

1) There is a possible large child paedophile ring being protected by a group of people with power

2) Such rings was also not just about sex with minors, but also linked to a possible ritualistic activities

3) Humanity possibly have not gotten over our "past" of ritualistic sacrifices to Moloch (eg. sacrificial pits of ancient times, the sacrifice of Agamemnons daughter Iphigeneia, cannibalism of Shang Kings)


Kelly said...

I wonder what causes people to intentionally hurt others. Oh sure, I've read the psychological papers, the scientific findings, the neurobiological blah blahs, but really, did you ever just stop to consider what it must be like, feel like, to intentionally hurt a person in a way such as rape or even murder? I can't fathom it.

Cikgu Screwtape said...

Now I know why you were so sickened by the whole Dutroux case for the past several days. These guys are sick fucks out to hurt/kill/emotionally-cripple young, defenseless people.

You stupid academic Christians boasting about your correct Greek. THIS IS THE FACE OF EVIL! And the only thing you are doing is writing academic thesis to show the world how well-read you are? Or inspirational rubbish to soothe/numb the senses of the adherents to your religion (opiate)?

~ Edmund

Anonymous said...

Hello Kelly,

Thanks for the comment...

Yes i've tried very hard but i just can't understand . But some people seem to derive a sick satisfaction from the pain of others. The more extreme the pain, the more the pleasure.

La Tey